Essay on planet in crisis

You May Also Like
Contents:
  1. Ecological crisis and the tragedy of the commodity
  2. Climate change: 12 years to save the planet? Make that 18 months - BBC News
  3. The Difference a Degree Makes
  4. What is Actually Happening to our Planet?

Ecological crisis and the tragedy of the commodity

June 8, at am. Well put, the world needs more people on you level! June 9, at am. A powerful piece of writing! BroadBlogs says:. June 10, at am. So important! Keep spreading the word. June 10, at pm. Martina Ramsauer says:. July 27, at am. Less is more, you are right, thank you for your comment! October 27, at am. Carl D'Agostino says:. August 2, at am. Thank you for your comment. Brenda Davis Harsham says:. August 3, at pm. Fascinating how many varied opinions. Thoughtful piece. Thanks, Brenda. August 4, at am. Thanks to you for the comment! Yoshiko says:.

September 1, at am. Good and strong argumentative factual message. September 1, at pm. JoAnne Silvia says:. November 15, at pm. Yes, it is urgent. January 16, at am.

Humanity, in essence, is in a race between potency and awareness.

Christy B says:. January 25, at pm. January 26, at am. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. Follow me at To look in wonder and awe At the power of Nature, And to feel its inner pulse Running within ourselves We are not s… twitter. But a Star can guide you to a Safe des… twitter.

Climate change: 12 years to save the planet? Make that 18 months - BBC News

Create a free website or blog at WordPress. We build our view of the universe outward from our own experience, a reflexive tendency that surely shapes our ability to comprehend genuinely existential threats to the species. We have a tendency to wait for others to act, rather than acting ourselves; a preference for the present situation; a disinclination to change things; and an excess of confidence that we can change things easily, should we need to, no matter the scale.

His solution is a wonky one: We should all be more rigorous in our cost-benefit analysis. That climate change demands expertise, and faith in it, at precisely the moment when public confidence in expertise is collapsing is one of its many paradoxes. That climate change touches so many of our cognitive biases is a mark of just how big it is and how much about human life it touches, which is to say, nearly everything. And unfortunately, as climate change has been dawning more fully into view over the past several decades, all the cognitive biases that push us toward complacency have been abetted by our storytelling about warming — by journalism defined by caution in describing the scale and speed of the threat.

So what can we do? The size of the threat from climate change means that organization is necessary at every level — communities, states, nations and international agreements that coordinate action among them. Instead we live in a consumer culture that tells us we can make our political mark on the world through where we shop, what we wear, how we eat. But conscious consumption is a cop-out, a neoliberal diversion from collective action, which is what is necessary.